Decomposition of trends in earnings inequality (Gini) between couples due to changes in earnings homogamy
. | Observed . | Standardized 2013 . | Observed Change . | Standardized Change . | Contribution (%) . | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | 1988 . | 2013 . | ||||
. | A1 . | A2 . | B . | C (= A2 – A1) . | D (= B – A1) . | E (= (C – D) /C) . |
a. Total | ||||||
.1451 | .3102 | .2999 | .1651 | .1549* | 6.20 | |
b. Husband's Earnings Decile | Ek (= (C – D) / (0.1651 – 0.1549)) | |||||
1 | .0183 | .0338 | .0350 | .0156 | .0167† | −10.98 |
2 | .0138 | .0276 | .0276 | .0138 | .0138 | −0.03 |
3 | .0122 | .0246 | .0250 | .0124 | .0128 | −3.94 |
4 | .0115 | .0237 | .0232 | .0121 | .0117 | 4.21 |
5 | .0110 | .0229 | .0225 | .0119 | .0115 | 3.50 |
6 | .0113 | .0239 | .0233 | .0126 | .0112† | 6.18 |
7 | .0116 | .0252 | .0240 | .0135 | .0124* | 11.27 |
8 | .0127 | .0292 | .0270 | .0165 | .0143* | 22.07 |
9 | .0157 | .0368 | .0351 | .0212 | .0194† | 17.26 |
10 | .0269 | .0625 | .0573 | .0355 | .0304* | 50.44 |
. | Observed . | Standardized 2013 . | Observed Change . | Standardized Change . | Contribution (%) . | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | 1988 . | 2013 . | ||||
. | A1 . | A2 . | B . | C (= A2 – A1) . | D (= B – A1) . | E (= (C – D) /C) . |
a. Total | ||||||
.1451 | .3102 | .2999 | .1651 | .1549* | 6.20 | |
b. Husband's Earnings Decile | Ek (= (C – D) / (0.1651 – 0.1549)) | |||||
1 | .0183 | .0338 | .0350 | .0156 | .0167† | −10.98 |
2 | .0138 | .0276 | .0276 | .0138 | .0138 | −0.03 |
3 | .0122 | .0246 | .0250 | .0124 | .0128 | −3.94 |
4 | .0115 | .0237 | .0232 | .0121 | .0117 | 4.21 |
5 | .0110 | .0229 | .0225 | .0119 | .0115 | 3.50 |
6 | .0113 | .0239 | .0233 | .0126 | .0112† | 6.18 |
7 | .0116 | .0252 | .0240 | .0135 | .0124* | 11.27 |
8 | .0127 | .0292 | .0270 | .0165 | .0143* | 22.07 |
9 | .0157 | .0368 | .0351 | .0212 | .0194† | 17.26 |
10 | .0269 | .0625 | .0573 | .0355 | .0304* | 50.44 |
Note: Significance levels (H0: C – D = 0) are based on bootstrapping of 100 replications.
†p < .10; *p < .05