Table 5

Main effects: Online petition and donation

Intention to SignSelf-report: SignActual Sign-upIndex: PetitionDonation
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)
A. Experiment 1 
  Treatment –0.031 0.021 0.002 –0.005 0.067 
(0.053) (0.055) (0.019) (0.050) (0.056) 
[1] [1] [1]   
  Number of observations 1,193 1,193 1,193 1,193 1,193 
  Scaled effect –.04 .03 –– –.01 .171 
  Control mean 0.112 
B. Experiment 2: Main 
  Treatment 0.061 –0.069 –0.036 –0.004 0.222* 
(0.063) (0.054) (0.019) (0.054) (0.082) 
[.271] [.271] [.212]   
  Number of observations 800 800 800 800 800 
  Scaled effect .09 –.15 –– .363 
  Control mean 0.106 
Intention to SignSelf-report: SignActual Sign-upIndex: PetitionDonation
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)
A. Experiment 1 
  Treatment –0.031 0.021 0.002 –0.005 0.067 
(0.053) (0.055) (0.019) (0.050) (0.056) 
[1] [1] [1]   
  Number of observations 1,193 1,193 1,193 1,193 1,193 
  Scaled effect –.04 .03 –– –.01 .171 
  Control mean 0.112 
B. Experiment 2: Main 
  Treatment 0.061 –0.069 –0.036 –0.004 0.222* 
(0.063) (0.054) (0.019) (0.054) (0.082) 
[.271] [.271] [.212]   
  Number of observations 800 800 800 800 800 
  Scaled effect .09 –.15 –– .363 
  Control mean 0.106 

Notes: Outcome variables in columns 1 and 2 are normalized by the mean and the standard deviation of the variable for the control group (Kling et al. 2007). In other words, the coefficients represent the effect size in terms of standard deviations away from the mean. The scaled effect is the treatment effect divided by the average difference in the answers given by Democrats and Republicans in the control group. In panel A, we display the results from Experiment 1. In panel B, we display the results from Experiment 2. We include the same list of controls as in Table 2. Robust standard errors are displayed in parentheses; p values adjusted for a false discovery rate of 5% are presented in brackets.

p < .10; *p < .05

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal