Econometricians have from the start considered historical knowledge of their own discipline as reflexive knowledge useful for delineating their discipline, that is, for setting its disciplinary boundaries with respect to its aims, its methods, and its scientific values. As such, the histories written by econometricians reflect the scientific image of their discipline in a given period. Each image of a period is drawn by denominating forerunners and founding fathers and uses the language of the dominant philosophy of science of that day.
At the end of the nineteenth century, a scientific theory had to be mathematical; in the interbellum the image of science was that of logical positivism. In the 1970s and 1980s the dominant views were those of Karl Popper, Imre Lakatos, and Thomas Kuhn. Currently the scientific image in econometrics is the one of the Stanford school (Nancy Cartwright, Ian Hacking, and Patrick Suppes).
We would like to thank the participants of the HOPE 2010 conference for their contributions and comments; see footnote 7 for their names. We also would like to thank Duo Qin for her many valuable comments, and Marcel would like to thank Mary Morgan in particular for numerous conversations. We also would like to thank Alain Pirotte and the external referees for their excellent reports.
The text of this article is only available as a PDF.
References
American Economic Association (AEA)
. 1985
. Preliminary Announcement of the Program: Ninety-Eighth Meeting of the American Economic Association
. American Economic Review
75.4
:899
–917
.Bjerkholt, O.; Qin, D..
2011a
. Teaching Economics as a Science: The Yale Lectures of Ragnar Frisch
. In Bjerkholt and Qin 2011b
.———, eds.
2011b
. A Dynamic Approach to Economic Theory
. London
: Routledge
.Chalmers, A. F.
1976
. What Is This Thing Called Science?
Queensland
: University of Queensland Press
.Christ, C. F.
1952
. A History of the Cowles Commission, 1932–1952
. In Economic Theory and Measurement
. Chicago
: Cowles Commission for Research in Economics
.———.
1967
. Econometrics in Economics: Some Achievements and Challenges
. Australian Economic Papers
6
:155
–70
.———.
1977
. Karl Brunner at the Cowles Commission: A Reminiscence
. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking
9.1
(pt. 2
): 245
–46
.———.
1983
. The Founding of the Econometric Society and Econometrica
. Econometrica
51.1
:3
–6
.———.
1985
. Early Progress in Estimating Quantitative Economic Relationships in America
. American Economic Review
75.6
:39
–52
.———.
1994
. The Cowles Commission’s Contributions to Econometrics at Chicago, 1939–1955
. Journal of Economic Literature
32.1
:30
–59
.Coats, A. W.
1987
. Review Essay: History of Political Economy; The AEA and the History of Economics
. History of Economics Society Bulletin
9
:61
–66
.Corry, L.
1989
. Linearity and Reflexivity in the Growth of Mathematical Knowledge
. Science in Context
3.2
:409
–40
.Cournot, A. [
1897
] 1927
. Researches into the Mathematical Principles of the Theory of Wealth
. New York
: Macmillan
.Cramer, H.
1972
. On the History of Certain Expansions Used in Mathematical Statistics
. Biometrica
59
:205
–7
.De Marchi, N., ed.
1988a
. The Popperian Legacy in Economics
. Cambridge
: Cambridge University Press
.———.
1988b
. Popper and the LSE Economists
. In De Marchi 1988a
.———.
1991
. Introduction: Rethinking Lakatos
. In De Marchi and Blaug 1991
.De Marchi, N.; Blaug, M., eds.
1991
. Appraising Economic Theories: Studies in the Methodology of Research Programs
. Aldershot, U.K.
: Elgar
.De Marchi, N.; Gilbert, C., eds.
1989
. History and Methodology of Econometrics
. Special issue
, Oxford Economic Papers
41.1
.Divisia, F.
1953
. La société d’économétrie a attient sa majorité
. Econometrica
21.1
:1
–30
.Epstein, R. J.
1984
. Econometric Methodology in Historical Perspective
. PhD diss.
, Yale University
.———.
1987
. A History of Econometrics
. Amsterdam
: North-Holland
.Ericsson, N. R.
2004
. The ET Interview: Professor David F. Hendry
. Econometric Theory
20.4
:743
–804
.Farebrother, R. W.
2006
. Early Explorations in Econometrics
. In Mills and Patterson 2006
.Fisher, I.
1892
. Mathematical Investigations in the Theory of Value and Prices
. Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences
9
:1
–124
.———. [
1897
] 1927
. Bibliography of Mathematical Economics
. In Cournot [1897] 1927
.———.
1898
. Cournot and Mathematical Economics
. Quarterly Journal of Economics
12.2
:119
–38
.Frisch, R.
1926
. Sur un problème d’économique pure
. Norsk matematisk forenings skrifter
1.16
:1
–40
.———.
1933
. Editorial
. Econometrica
1.1
:1
–4
.———.
1971
. On a Problem in Pure Economics
. In Preferences, Utility, and Demand: A Minnesota Symposium
, edited by Chipman, J. S.; Hurwicz, L.; Richter, M. K.; Sonnenschein, H. F.. New York
: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
.———.
2011
. The Yale Lectures
. In Bjerkholt and Qin 2011b
.Gilbert, C. L.
1986
. The Development of British Econometrics, 1945–85
. Applied Economics Discussion Paper 8
. Oxford
: Institute of Economics and Statistics
.Gilbert, C. L.; Qin, D..
2006
. The First Fifty Years of Modern Econometrics
. In Mills and Patterson 2006
.Haavelmo, T.
1944
. The Probability Approach in Econometrics
. Econometrica
12
(supplement
): i–viii, 1–118
.Hacking, I.
1975
. The Emergence of Probability
. Cambridge
: Cambridge University Press
.Hands, D. W.
1988
. Ad Hocness in Economics and the Popperian Tradition
. In De Marchi 1988a
.Hendry, D. F.
1980
. Econometrics—Alchemy or Science?
Economica
47
:387
–406
.———.
1986
. Foreword
. In Spanos 1986
.Hendry, D. F.; Morgan, M. S., eds.
1995
. The Foundations of Econometric Analysis
. Cambridge
: Cambridge University Press
.Hendry, D. F.; Leamer, E. E.; Poirier, D. J..
1990
. The ET Dialogue: A Conversation on Econometric Methodology
. Econometric Theory
6
:171
–261
.Hildreth, C.
1986
. The Cowles Commission in Chicago, 1939–1955
. Berlin
: Springer-Verlag
.———.
2010
. Minisymposium on the History of Econometrics: Introduction
. HOPE
42.1
:19
–20
.Jevons, W. S.
1878
. Bibliography of Works on the Mathematical Theory of Political Economy
. Journal of the Statistical Society of London
41.2
:398
–401
.———. [
1879
] 1957
. The Theory of Political Economy
. 5th ed. New York
: Kelley
.Keynes, J. M.
1939
. Professor Tinbergen’s Method
. Economic Journal
49
:558
–68
.Kuhn, T.
1962
. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
. Chicago
: University of Chicago Press
.Lakatos, I.
1971
. History of Science and Its Rational Reconstructions
. In Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 8
, edited by Buck, R. C.; Cohen, R. S.. Dordrecht
: Reidel
.———.
1974
. Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes
. In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge
, edited by Lakatos, I.; Musgrave, A. E.. Cambridge
: Cambridge University Press
.Leamer, E. E.
1983
. Let’s Take the Con out of Econometrics
. American Economic Review
79
:31
–43
.Lindbeck, A.
1985
. The Prize in Economic Science in Memory of Alfred Nobel
. Journal of Economic Literature
23.1
:37
–56
.Lundberg, E.
1992
. The Prize for Economic Science in Memory of Alfred Nobel
. In Nobel Lectures, Economic Sciences, 1969–1980
, edited by Lindbeck, A.. Singapore
: World Scientific
.Maistrov, L. E.
1974
. Probability Theory: A Historical Sketch
. New York
: Academic Press
.McAleer, M.; Pagan, A. R.; Volker, P. A..
1985
. What Will Take the Con out of Econometrics?
American Economic Review
75.3
:293
–307
.Mills, T. C.; Patterson, K., eds.
2006
. Econometric Theory. Vol. 1 of Palgrave Handbook of Econometrics
. Basingstoke, U.K.
: Palgrave
.Morgan, M. S.
1982
. Errors in Variables or in Equations?
A Study in the History of Econometric Thought
. Unpublished paper
, London School of Economics
.———.
1984
. The Probability Revolution: Haavelmo’s Contribution to Econometrics
. Unpublished paper
, London School of Economics
.———.
1987
. Statistics without Probability and Haavelmo’s Revolution in Econometrics
. In The Probabilistic Revolution. Vol. 2 of Ideas in the Sciences
, edited by Krüger, L.; Gigerenzer, G.; Morgan, M. S.. Cambridge
: MIT Press
.———.
1990
. The History of Econometric Ideas
. Cambridge
: Cambridge University Press
.Pagan, A.
1987
. Three Econometric Methodologies: A Critical Appraisal
. Journal of Economic Surveys
1.1
:3
–24
.Polanyi, M.
1964
. Personal Knowledge towards a Post Critical Philosophy
. New York
: Harper and Row
.———.
1969
. Conjectures and Refutations
. London
: Routledge and Kegan Paul
.Qin, D.
1993
. Formation of Econometrics: A Historical Perspective
. Oxford
: Oxford University Press
.Seal, H. L.
1967
. The Historical Development of the Gauss Linear Model
. Biometrica
54
:1
–24
.Sims, C. A.
1980
. Macroeconomics and Reality
. Econometrica
48.1
:1
–48
.Spanos, A.
1986
. Statistical Foundations of Econometric Modelling
. Cambridge
: Cambridge University Press
.———.
2006
. Econometrics in Retrospect and Prospect
. In Mills and Patterson 2006
.Stigler, G. J.
1954
. The Early History of Empirical Studies of Consumer Behaviour
. Journal of Political Economy
62.2
:95
–113
.Tansey, E. M.
1997
. What Is a Witness Seminar? In Wellcome Witnesses to Twentieth Century Medicine
, edited by Tansey, E. M.; Catterall, P. P.; Christie, D. A.; Willhoft, S. V.; Reynolds, L. A.. Vol. 1
. London
: Wellcome Trust
. .Tinbergen, J.
1939
. Statistical Testing of Business-Cycle Theories. Vol. 1, A Method and Its Application to Investment Activity; vol. 2, Business Cycles in the United States of America
. Geneva
: League of Nations
.Tintner, G.
1953
. The Definition of Econometrics
. Econometrica
21.1
:31
–40
.Walras, L.
1878
. Bibliographie des ouvrages relatifs a l’application des mathématiques a l’économie politique
. Journal des économistes
, 4th ser.
, 4
(December
): 470
–77
.Weintraub, E. R.
1985
. General Equilibrium Analysis: Studies in Appraisal
. Cambridge
: Cambridge University Press
.———.
2002
. How Economics Became a Mathematical Science
. Durham, N.C.
: Duke University Press
.Copyright 2011 by Duke University Press
2011
This content is made freely available by the publisher. It may not be redistributed or altered. All rights reserved.
Issue Section:
Articles
