“Who died and made you king?” Many philosophers and followers of Plato will, without blinking, respond that Plato made them philosopher-kings. Some disciples of Plato acknowledge that this position can be embarrassing. Thus, we have texts like Jonny Thakkar's Plato as Critical Theorist, which struggles to justify philosophers as rulers by squeezing Plato's assertions under Lady Liberty's aegis, as if they had been part of her inclusive couture all along. Parallel projects to keep Plato as high priest include jettisoning the philosopher-king model while peddling the eminence of a Platonic process; say, the Socratic method. For example, Jill Frank in Poetic Justice reads the Republic (577a) as a repudiation of philosopher-kings in favor of people who want a little informed “conversation” with those “awakened to reflection.” The “awakened” seem to include gentle souls like Wayne Booth but not critics of Plato like Kojin Karatani, who denies that Plato and...
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Book Review|
January 01 2022
Plato and the Mythic Tradition in Political Thought
Keum, Tae-Yeoun,
Plato and the Mythic Tradition in Political Thought
(Cambridge, MA
: Harvard University Press
, 2020
), 322
pp.
Bruce Krajewski
Bruce Krajewski is the author of Traveling with Hermes: Hermeneutics and Rhetoric; editor of Gadamer's Repercussions; coeditor of The Man in the High Castle and Philosophy: Subversive Reports from Another Reality; and cotranslator of Gadamer on Celan, for which he shared the Modern Language Association's Aldo and Jean Scaglione Prize for a Translation of a Scholarly Study of Literature.
Search for other works by this author on:
Common Knowledge (2022) 28 (1): 160–162.
Citation
Bruce Krajewski; Plato and the Mythic Tradition in Political Thought. Common Knowledge 1 January 2022; 28 (1): 160–162. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/0961754X-9713773
Download citation file:
Advertisement
54
Views