Marginality in philosophy can be active or reactive. Marginality is reactive when it is a reaction to domination, imposed by force, and resented. Reactive marginality chases the legitimacy of the center. It would happily reconstitute as a tolerated specialization. Active marginality flees normalization. When a paradigm approaches, it moves elsewhere. Active marginality colonizes the margins, which for it are a position of strength or at least creativity. The author suggests that philosophers disabuse themselves of the notion that there is a special work of theirs where knowledge is difficult but of inestimable value. Our best work is on the margins of sense. This conclusion is elaborated with a look at recent work in “philosophical anthropology” and “anthropological philosophy” associated with the so-called ontological turn in anthropology.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| April 01 2018
Modes of Margin in Philosophy: Anthropological Philosophy, or Philosophical Anthropology
Common Knowledge (2018) 24 (2): 181–189.
Barry Allen; Modes of Margin in Philosophy: Anthropological Philosophy, or Philosophical Anthropology. Common Knowledge 1 April 2018; 24 (2): 181–189. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/0961754X-4362301
Download citation file:
Don't already have an account? Register
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your InstitutionSign In